Page 2 of 4

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:56 am
by katsmom
pnward wrote:
Yep, I've totally lost the plot now.
That's what happens when you have one way conversations with yourself. :lol: :lol:
I think we've all been there.

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 1:45 pm
by Bunnylump
pnward the thing with the medieval calendars is that the months' labours are all slightly different depending upon where they are drawn. The one I found had Jan -man dining by fire, feb -man chopping wood, march man pruning vines, april, woman holding wreath of flowers etc.

Personally, I think the key thing here is that they are representing different months, and as far as I can make out, the months represented are:

Jan, Feb,Mar,Apr,May,(no June) July, Aug, Sept, Oct, Nov (no December).

I've tried making the crosses on the spokes letters, no joy, I've tried making them letters reading clockwise and anticlockwise, and also changing direction depending on whether the cross is black or not. I have still no sensible answer. I can't work out what is happening with the black "filling" or the black spokes, as you said. Basically up a gum tree without a paddle or a clue. Again. :roll:

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:20 pm
by katsmom
Top row--cycles of hte moon? Zodiac?
aquarius, pices,?,?,?,?,?,?, the mage/wage. scorpio,?,?

bottom row--months and other things.
i get???the April? the new month, the harvest month, august, september, October, november, december

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:36 pm
by Bunnylump
OK I'm totally confused now. I've just gone back on to the website and two extra months have appeared!!! The original one I printed out only had 10 months on it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :?

Scurra re you trying to do a Richard Hillman - Audrey Roberts trick on me to convince me I'm going mad?? :shock:

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:45 pm
by katsmom
I just wish the words were a bit more readable. the third picture on the top looks like eva fler. But knowing Scurra hte words aren't important anyway. It must be those circles and crosses tht we haave to look at.

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:30 pm
by LAT
The writing is in German I presume, and probably Medieval German at that. Any experts on Medieval German around? But as you say, I think it is the wheels and markers that we need to interpret. Only question is how?

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:34 pm
by giraffe
I tried decoding the suns using the letters of the alphabet and missing out Q and Z as fairly useless letters (although I would argue Z has its uses) Starting at midnight for A, and the beginning of the day as A or the beginning of the nght as A. I didn't get anywhere with any of these methods and wasn't sure if I should start on the line between day and night or the first full day one as A. I didn't like the midnight method as most of them didn't seem to have one pointing straight down, so it was a bit hit and miss. This also assumes I was right when I counted 24, not 25 like someone else did and perhaps missing out Q was wrong.

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:22 pm
by SparkOut
You're all getting a lot warmer now.

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:25 pm
by Laura
is that all you're going to say!!!!!!

How infuriating!

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:36 pm
by SparkOut
It's all I'd better say out loud here.

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:08 pm
by eirian
LAT wrote:The writing is in German I [resume, and probably Medieval German at that. Any experts on Medieval German around?
Bah, I knew Wulfruna was useful for something. Will have to nag her to come on here now and help out. (or maybe that's where Scurra got the words from in the first place)

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:13 pm
by Scurra
OK, I'm going to step in now.
The words have nothing to do with the puzzle. Trust me on this.
Is that explicit enough for everyone?

:lol:

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:21 pm
by LAT
SparkOut wrote:You're all getting a lot warmer now.
Is this your way of telling us you've solved this one?
SparkOut wrote:It's all I'd better say out loud here.
Anything you'd care to whisper to me?

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:35 pm
by Bunnylump
Or me? You know you're just itching to whisper sweet nothings in my long purple ears!!! :lol:

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 7:43 am
by pnward
I have tried the alphabet going clockwise on black cross and anticlockwise on yellow cross and vice versa and then put all results through a cypher decoder and finaly have the answer which is

XQZTYLOKCJ

Unfortunatley Scurras website must have broken as it wont except this as the correct answer. :lol:

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:08 pm
by pnward
Ive managed to get ROOMST on the top row and a load of garbage on the bottom, although ROOMST is pretty much garbage as well I guess.

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 11:07 am
by katsmom
Well I'll agree with you pnward, Scurra's answer machine must be broken because it won't take my series of random letters either. :?

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:20 pm
by maisie ladybird
By some fluke I've managed to make a word from the top 6 circles (probably completely wrong), but when I apply same method to the bottom circles it doesn't work - is there anyone I can pm this word to to see if I am on the right track (or not)?

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:26 pm
by LAT
I'm here if you want me to comment on what you have.

Re: The monastic year

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:19 pm
by giraffe
The bottom row is harder to read, even when right. ;)