Eurovision

Chat about anything and everything under the sun.
Forum rules
Please don't discuss puzzles in here! Thank you.
Message
Author
User avatar
MBH
King of the Swingers
Posts: 3346
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:07 pm
Currently reading: 39 Clues series/Darksmith series/and....
Location: Gateshead

Re: Eurovision

#41 Post by MBH » Mon May 18, 2009 12:16 am

I actually saw some of the semi-final stages of Eurovision while I was sorting the papers of my home office out (all across the living room floor). Usual bunch of songs as far as I could tell.

When I happen to notice it on, I enjoy BGT in the 'heats' stage where you get all the crazy acts. I like 'variety shows', and you never know what's coming on next. YouTube is always handy for anything you hear about but didn't see (such as the Susan Boyle affair) - the links to 'related' can give some nice surprises such as the dance group "Flawless" :)

User avatar
Cenwulf
The Complete Fool
Posts: 1350
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:17 pm
Currently reading: Schott's Miscellanies
Location: South Wessex

Re: Eurovision

#42 Post by Cenwulf » Sun May 30, 2010 3:50 pm

So the hulking Eurovision bandwagon creaks its way out of Oslo and heads for Germany.
And the UK finishes bottom again.
Mainly because the National Judging Panel for each country is just as biased as the general public.
But also because the German song has been knocking around the airwaves of Europe for the past six weeks. I thought the songs weren't supposed to be freely available until after the contest.

Personally I think there should be no permanent places. Only the host should be an automatic finalist - everyone else should have to qualify through the semi-finals. At least then we would only be rejected by half of Europe rather than all of it.

It was another year of 'seeing someone singing the line before the one being heard' for me as I had pictures from muted BBC1 (Digital) and sound from Radio 2 with Ken Bruce (analogue).
Unfortunately, the number of ways of doing something wrong far exceed the number of ways of doing it right. G. Kasparov

16000 - 30/03/2017

neves-ytnewt rebmun rebmem suomynona srelzzup

User avatar
Laura
Posts: 1901
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:26 am

Re: Eurovision

#43 Post by Laura » Sun May 30, 2010 4:25 pm

My sisters did an alternative Eurovision, where countries were awarded points for quality of the staging, amount of flesh on show etc. with bonus points if you could tell when the key change was about to happen. Apparently Serbia won in their version.

User avatar
Cenwulf
The Complete Fool
Posts: 1350
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:17 pm
Currently reading: Schott's Miscellanies
Location: South Wessex

Re: Eurovision

#44 Post by Cenwulf » Tue May 17, 2011 8:16 pm

The Eurovision Roadshow hauls its way out of Dusseldorf. At least the UK did better this year than last year. But because we were never part of the USSR, it seems that we'll never even get close to winning. And next year it's in Azerbaijan, which is so far east it's actually in Asia. We'll be having China entering next year.

Or maybe Australia. It's popular Down Under, and they make a weekend of it.This is what might have happened this year...

"G'day from Canberra. Here is the result of the Australian voting"
Ukraine, 1 point: l'Ucraine, une point.
United Kingdom, 2 points: la Royaume-uni, deux points.
Denmark, 3 points: la Danmarc, trois points.
Sweden, 4 points : la Suede, quatre points.
Hungary, 5 points: l'Hongrie, cinq points.
Moldova, 6 points: la Moldovie, six points.
Bosnia & Herzegovina, 7 points: la Bosnie et Hercegovine, sept points.
Serbia, 8 points: la Serbie, huit points.
Greece, 10 points: la Grece, dix points.
Ireland, 12 points: l'Irlande, douze points.
Last edited by Cenwulf on Tue May 17, 2011 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Unfortunately, the number of ways of doing something wrong far exceed the number of ways of doing it right. G. Kasparov

16000 - 30/03/2017

neves-ytnewt rebmun rebmem suomynona srelzzup

User avatar
Scurra
Alias the Jester
Posts: 16803
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Lost, as usual

Re: Eurovision

#45 Post by Scurra » Tue May 17, 2011 10:01 pm

Test post to see what happens.
Never put off till tomorrow what you can do the day after tomorrow.
All of my puzzles are simple and obvious. For certain values of "simple" and "obvious".

User avatar
LAT
Nagging Nora
Posts: 13786
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:11 pm
Currently reading: Piranesi

Re: Eurovision

#46 Post by LAT » Wed May 18, 2011 12:09 am

And what does happen?

User avatar
Wulfruna
Posts: 4083
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:21 pm
Location: Glorious Devon

Re: Eurovision

#47 Post by Wulfruna » Wed May 18, 2011 11:38 pm

Scurra wrote:Test post to see what happens.
Well, I know you went to the opticians last week :shock: - so can you now see what happens?

User avatar
LAT
Nagging Nora
Posts: 13786
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:11 pm
Currently reading: Piranesi

Re: Eurovision

#48 Post by LAT » Wed May 18, 2011 11:45 pm

:lol:
Well maybe I need to go too so that I can see what happens. ;)

User avatar
gill216
She who cannot be Thwarted
Posts: 5671
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:08 pm
Currently reading: Nothing

Re: Eurovision

#49 Post by gill216 » Wed May 18, 2011 11:48 pm

Just to let you know I got that Scurra :lol: :lol: :lol:
"If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe." -Carl Sagan

User avatar
Bunnylump
Granny Boingybott
Posts: 24993
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:10 pm
Currently reading: Go Set a Watchman
Location: Treacle Bumstead

Re: Eurovision

#50 Post by Bunnylump » Thu May 19, 2011 8:03 am

I'm SO confused... :lol:
You're only given a little spark of madness. You mustn't lose it.

“Tomorrow is always fresh, with no mistakes in it yet.”

User avatar
Cenwulf
The Complete Fool
Posts: 1350
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:17 pm
Currently reading: Schott's Miscellanies
Location: South Wessex

Re: Eurovision

#51 Post by Cenwulf » Sun May 27, 2012 10:37 pm

So the hulking great Eurovision bandwagon creaks its way out of Baku and heads for Sweden.
The Claudia Winkelman lookalike channeling Kate Bush has had her song in the charts in 14 different countries and top in four of them.
The only country not to give any points to the Swedes was Italy.

The Hump did his best but being first up is not the best place to win it. All we got were crumbs from the rich man's table. At least we weren't bottom - that was Norway's place.
Unfortunately, the number of ways of doing something wrong far exceed the number of ways of doing it right. G. Kasparov

16000 - 30/03/2017

neves-ytnewt rebmun rebmem suomynona srelzzup

User avatar
Bunnylump
Granny Boingybott
Posts: 24993
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:10 pm
Currently reading: Go Set a Watchman
Location: Treacle Bumstead

Re: Eurovision

#52 Post by Bunnylump » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:54 pm

Oh, look...

They're using my "mate"*
http://www.eurovision.tv/page/news?id=b ... ed_kingdom
*Well, OK, I only met her once - she thought I was a backing singer (obviously never heard me sing!! :lol: ) A friend of ours has toured Europe with her on for years as a bass player. When it was his 50th birthday party, she suddenly materialised,unexpectedly, having flown over specially from Portugal just to give him a present.

I know we haven't heard anything much from her since the ghastly "Holding out for a Hero" here, but I have to say this lady is a very hard worker, and still sells out when touring in Europe. So I say good luck to her, even it if is a pretty rubbish song and IMHO a pretty pointless competition. She was a very nice lady, and at her age has a great deal of "oomph" to keep going like that with such enthusiasm and gusto over so many years. :D
You're only given a little spark of madness. You mustn't lose it.

“Tomorrow is always fresh, with no mistakes in it yet.”

User avatar
Cenwulf
The Complete Fool
Posts: 1350
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:17 pm
Currently reading: Schott's Miscellanies
Location: South Wessex

Re: Eurovision

#53 Post by Cenwulf » Sun May 24, 2015 9:40 pm

Well, that's the Annual cheesefest of Eurovision over for another year. And the UK does badly yet again, with a measly 5 points. Though this was more than France, Germany and Austria added together.
Rather pointed comment from one of the hostesses when people were booing Russia for being in the lead - she said it was about the music, not the politics. (But I bet people are relieved that it's going to Sweden rather than Russia!)
Above, I wrote:We'll be having China entering next year. Or maybe Australia.
Little did I know how accurate my comment would be... Australia enters as a wildcard and ends up in 5th place.
As for China, although they didn't enter, it was still shown live in Chinese TV.
Unfortunately, the number of ways of doing something wrong far exceed the number of ways of doing it right. G. Kasparov

16000 - 30/03/2017

neves-ytnewt rebmun rebmem suomynona srelzzup

User avatar
Scurra
Alias the Jester
Posts: 16803
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Lost, as usual

Re: Eurovision

#54 Post by Scurra » Sun May 24, 2015 11:29 pm

Again, I am convinced that not being in the semi-finals has a significant detrimental effect on the "big 5" who have routinely done very badly since they were introduced - the sole exception was the year when Germany won, and that was mainly because they decided that they were going to win that year, and did pretty much everything they could to ensure that they would! But having the song performed live in a semi-final clearly makes a difference, both in terms of recognition and in terms of performance. (I grant you that Italy did fairly well this year, although I have no idea why, even allowing for weird voting.)

I thought our entry was rather better than usual, but as well as the semi-final issue, it was also noticeably out-of-step with most of the rest of the entries - admittedly, this was because most of the entries tend to be attempts to do what did well last year rather than anything else, hence the excess of big female ballads; ironically Sweden probably won because it was their entry from last year that was being copied the most...
Never put off till tomorrow what you can do the day after tomorrow.
All of my puzzles are simple and obvious. For certain values of "simple" and "obvious".

User avatar
SparkOut
International Man of Mystery
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:58 am

Re: Eurovision

#55 Post by SparkOut » Mon May 25, 2015 10:21 pm

I did watch it, so I can have something to say. But then again, it was Eurovision, so that means it is compulsory to have a year's quota of alcohol in one night, so what I have to say may be berblerblerbrerfiggle but
Scurra wrote:Again, I am convinced that not being in the semi-finals has a significant detrimental effect on the "big 5" who have routinely done very badly since they were introduced <snip> But having the song performed live in a semi-final clearly makes a difference, both in terms of recognition and in terms of performance.
Interesting idea that I never thought of before (why would I, I try to avoid thinking about Eurovision) but now I agree.
Scurra wrote:(I grant you that Italy did fairly well this year, although I have no idea why, even allowing for weird voting.)
Apparently Italy would have won if the whole contest were decided by televoting alone. The song was fairly good as far as Eurovision goes, but the same as every tired pop-opera song since Il Divo emerged, the performance was the same as every tired pop-opera performance since... but they sang it well, the same as every...
I thought it was deserving of a highly placed result, but shouldn't have been a serious contender for the win.
Scurra wrote:I thought our entry was rather better than usual, but as well as the semi-final issue, it was also noticeably out-of-step with most of the rest of the entries
Yes, definitely. As you have said, Eurovision can turn up something unusual that works, but it didn't really hit this year's Eurovision target. Although the live vocals weren't really all that great either.

User avatar
Cenwulf
The Complete Fool
Posts: 1350
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:17 pm
Currently reading: Schott's Miscellanies
Location: South Wessex

Re: Eurovision

#56 Post by Cenwulf » Tue May 26, 2015 8:21 pm

Scurra wrote:I am convinced that not being in the semi-finals has a significant detrimental effect on the "big 5" who have routinely done very badly since they were introduced ... But having the song performed live in a semi-final clearly makes a difference, both in terms of recognition and in terms of performance.
We seem to be in agreement that the 'Big 5' (originally 'Big 4' until Italy decided to make a return after about 20 years) shouldn't have an automatic place in the final... though possibly for different reasons.
Cenwulf wrote:Personally I think there should be no permanent places. Only the host should be an automatic finalist - everyone else should have to qualify through the semi-finals. At least then we would only be rejected by half of Europe rather than all of it.
Unfortunately, the number of ways of doing something wrong far exceed the number of ways of doing it right. G. Kasparov

16000 - 30/03/2017

neves-ytnewt rebmun rebmem suomynona srelzzup

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests