#51
Post
by SparkOut » Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:24 am
The Master welcomes the student and wishes to advise that when editing a message, then to select colours, the simplest way is to highlight the words required, and then to wait for a moment so that the forum software catches up before clicking one of the coloured squares in the pane on the right. If the mouse pointer changes to a finger when it is over a coloured square, then it should work. I have noticed that if one selects the text and then clicks a coloured square too quickly, then it either ignores it or gives the wrong result, so it seems you may well have some tag codes in your message which do not each have a matching opening or closing tag to make a pair.
The more technical way is to note that just as one can use tags to show italics or bold, that the tags for colouring an item can be directly typed in, and are of the form:
[color=#0000FF] before the text to be coloured (the actual number indicates which colour to use), and [/color] immediately afterwards, to tell the browser to stop colouring. When you want to stop the colourisation, it is only necessary for there to be a "stop colouring" tag [/color] in order for the browser to switch back to the default text colour. You do not have to specify that everything should be coloured in (say) black to stop getting the red (or blue, or whatever colour you chose).
Please note the Americanised spelling of the word "color" and, if you prefer an anorak to an acolyte's robe, the colour code is made up of three "RGB" sections, which follow the # symbol to indicate that it's a number format (in hexadecimal digits). The first two digits in hexadecimal tell how much Red should be included in the colour mix. The next two digits say how much Green should be included and the last two digits say how much Blue. So the code #0000FF means, zero red, zero green, and as much blue as you can get. #FF0000 means all red and nothing else. Black would be #000000 and white would be #FFFFFF.
Anyway dear student, the Buddha would like to inform that he is indeed a "pet person" and a dog would be a welcome companion, but so also would the cat (or indeed any cat). Even an elephant would be a appreciated on this journey for its carrying and path-clearing ability, while a goat would be a nuisance and simply eat its way through all our stores. For other animals, the Buddha thinks that a horse would be high-maintenance and not useful on our journey, whereas a camel would be tremendously appreciated.
Last edited by
SparkOut on Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.